• Robert O Young DSc, PhD, Naturopathic Practitioner

Missing In Action

Updated: Dec 6, 2020

Dear Family, Friends and Patients,

For the last 9 months I have been researching, documenting and publishing articles based upon my findings that the Coronavirus has been missing in action. Go to www.drrobertyoung.com/blog

When I say missing, I’m talking about two MAJOR confessions, one from the CDC and the other from a group of study-authors in Europe. In each case, these organizations were in the process of assembling instructions on how to perform the diagnostic RT-PCR testing for a novel virus called the coronavirus. This is the same virus that these organizations have stated that they had not yet identified the coronavirus using the gold standard for identification, isolation, purification and culturing under KOCH's and River's Postulates.

These organizations and other published scientists have admitted in their publications that they had NOT followed Koch's or River's postulates for scientific validation of the existence of the so-called CoVid 2 or 19. In other words, the existence of the corona virus is still unproven.

Now, I want to point out 3 factors that produce a hypnotic or illusionary effect or a belief in something that does not exist nor has proven to exist!

ONE: Scientists and public health agencies claim they’ve ISOLATED the coronavirus. There's no reason scientific reason to believe any of these scientists or their statements. The term “isolation” is thrown around like a politician throws around the term, “the people.”

​Isolation of a virus SHOULD mean it is separated out from all the genetic, cellular, microbial, and acidic waste material that it is swimming. But don’t assume, when professionals are talking or writing about the coronavirus, that this is what they really actually mean. Please do not assume that that the coronavirus has been isolated.

For example, current medical coronavirus virologists often mean: “We have the virus in a dish in the lab. Although, the soup in the dish contains human cells, animal cells, chemicals, toxic drugs, and other material." However, these scientists have taken the leap of faith and state based upon belief NOT scientific identification or isolation that they know the virus is there and growing, "because it is killing the cells.”

This conclusion is not only unscientific it is Absolutely Wrong!

There are more than sufficient chemical and biological toxic substances in the soup that are capable of doing all the cell-degenerating and genetic mutation. Further, the animal or human cells in the dish or culture are being deprived of vital alkalizing electron-rich nutrients. These factors alone will produce cell membrane degeneration, genetic mutation and cell death which I documented as the 'Corona Effect' in the mid-80's. It should be obvious, that the “so-called coronavirus” in the dish is surrounded by this mix of toxic acidic chemicals and foreign biological materials doing all the killing. The so-called coronavirus is far from being isolated and identified under Koch or River's postulates!

TWO: The following hypnotic and illusionary effect ropes in some of the brightest medical & scientific professionals (many who are educated beyond their intelligence), who otherwise challenge all sorts of medical dogma. It is: “the genetic sequence of the virus that is well established. Many studies confirm this.”

If so-called scientific experts have mapped the genetic structure of the virus, the virus must exist, right?


The genetic sequence is INFERRED and ASSUMED. This takes science into the realm of faith and belief making virology and religion NOT a science! There has never been the sequencing of any virus because viruses DO NOT exist unless you believe they exist which makes virology a religion NOT a science.

Bottom-line there is NO scientific evidence of the existence of any virus! Please read my peer-reviewed published paper called, "Second Thought About Viruses Vaccines and the HIV-AIDS Hypothesis."[26-28]

Citation: Young RO (2016) Second Thoughts about Viruses, Vaccines, and the HIV/AIDS Hypothesis - Part 1. Int J Vaccines Vaccin 2(3): 00032. DOI: 10.15406/ijvv.2016.02.00032

So Inferred from what?

The genetic sequencing of the coronavirus is cobbled together from several sources: a piece or pieces of RNA that they have arbitrarily been chosen as “relevant clues”; chosen according to a bias in favor of a certain type of genetic material totally unrelated to the isolation and purification and culturing of an actual virus.

Bias? What does that mean?

When a few dozen people in Wuhan, China fell ill, back in 2019, there were a million ways researchers could have gone, such as air pollution, magnetic field pollution from increased pulsation frequencies of 2.4gHz or above which depletes hemoglobin and causes the 'corona effect' or degeneration of the cell membrane from chemical poisoning from a flu vaccine.

Of course scientists would have looked out their windows, observed the air pollution hanging over the city, and realized these “unexplained cases” of pneumonia had a ridiculously simple origin. But no! The so-called researchers opted for a 'new virus.' And, they chose, without a shred of evidence, to 'look for' a germ from the phantom coronavirus family. This was a pre-planned story. This was the bias leading to the unfortunate Plandemic of 2020!

From this point on, the dye was cast!

The “genetic sequencing” involved cobbling together, by assumption and inference, a collage of INFORMATION, into code, generated by a computer program which would satisfy the pre-ordained scenario. They ASSEMBLED on an idea for a genetic sequence that matched what they were going for: a fake coronavirus that had never been isolated, purified or cultured and even shown to be contagious. This invented process would be generated by a computerized theory which began the coronavirus existence! NOT in a lab in Wuhan, China but as a evil concept invented on a piece of paper.

Do not think that genetic sequencing is performed by people who are looking directly at a virus through a cosmic electron microscope and jotting down the names of rows of genes sitting side by side like cars in a supermarket parking lot. This is nothing more than a fairytale turning the so-called science of virology into a religion that you are forced to trust and believe without ANY scientific proof!

THREE: The final hypnotic illusionary factor is the fake non-specific RT-PCR test. “If the test exists to detect the virus, the virus must exist.”

Wrong Again!

The RT-PCR test—which has irreparable and fatal flaws, as I’ve documented in many previous papers—is working, at best, from a 10 to 15 nucleotide fragment of RNA which is then ASSUMED to come from the non-existent coronavirus. If the test appears to identify that fragment as “relevant,” the test result clams the patient is “infected.” WOW! What a fraud!

People believe the test must mean something. And the only thing it could mean is: it finds a fragmented piece of RNA of approximately 10 to 30 nucleotides in length which is then assumed comes from a virus that is computer generated to be 3000 nucleotides in length which has never been identified, purified, isolated and cultured to prove infectivity in ANY doubled-blinded controlled group.

The deck is stacked

The game is rigged. Welcome to the Deep Medical State.

As in any truly deep operations, only a small number of elite professionals understand the basic con. The rest of the World are blind, and accepting. Some are willfully blind! They see the truth in a flash of insight, and then their lips are sealed!

However, in this mad coronavirus landscape, minds & doors are opening. The hypnotic illusionary haze is receding. The truth is coming out. Doctors, scientists, reporters, and members of the public are discovering and rejecting this fraud - The Big Con. And now, we move on to the first Smoking Gun.

Where is the coronavirus? The CDC says it is not available!

The CDC document is titled, “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel.” It was originally published in February, 2020, and re-published in July.

Buried deep in the document, on page 39, in a section titled, “Performance Characteristics,” we have this: "since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV [SARS-CoV-2] are currently available, diagnostic tests designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA." The key phrase there is: "since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV (SARS-CoV-2 virus are currently available."

Every object that exists can be quantified, which is to say, measured. The use of the term 'quantified' in that phrase means: the CDC has no virus, because it is unavailable. THEREFORE, THE CDC HAS NO VIRUS! One of the two most powerful public health agencies in the world cannot obtain the virus from anywhere. Why? Obviously, because it DOES NOT EXIST!

A further tip-off is the use of the word ‘isolates. This means NO ISOLATED VIRUS IS AVAILABLE! Another way to put it: NO ONE HAS AN ISOLATED SPECIMEN of the CoV-02 OR THE CoV- 19 VIRUS because IT DOES NOT EXIST!

The Reason

Not a single scientist in the World has ever isolated any theoretical virus, including HIV, Ebola, Zika, Polio, Measles, Flu, CoVid-2 and the CoVid-19 viruses using the scientific method of KOCH's and/or RIVER's Postulates.

What scientists are calling isolation is NOT isolation at All. Just more flawed science!

“All this chaos is the direct result of flawed science resting on the 'RT-PCR tests' being used to prove the existence of a global pandemic. And yet there are many scientists publishing indisputable evidence that the RT-PCR test is invalid. It is difficult not to conclude that a great hoax is taking place by parties that have been clearly identified.

"It is difficult to overstate the implications of this revelation. Every single thing about the CoVid orthodoxy relies on ‘case numbers’ and not 'mortality cases', which are largely the results of the now widespread PCR tests. If their results are essentially meaningless, then everything we are being told – and ordered to do by increasingly dictatorial governments – is likely to be incorrect. For instance, one of the authors of the review is Dr Mike Yeadon, who asserts that, in the UK, there is no ‘second wave’ and that the pandemic has been over since June. Having seen the PCR tests so unambiguously debunked, it is hard to see any evidence to the contrary." Even more pressing is the question of what is going to be done about this now.

The people responsible for writing and publishing this paper have to be held accountable. But also, all PCR testing based on the Corman-Drosten protocol should be stopped with immediate effect. All those who are so-called current ‘CoVid cases’, diagnosed based on that protocol, should be told they no longer have to be isolated. All present and previous CoVid deaths, cases, and ‘infection rates’ should be subject to a massive retroactive inquiry. And lockdowns, shutdowns, and other restrictions should be urgently reviewed and relaxed. Because these latest blows to PCR testing raises the probability that we are not enduring a killer virus pandemic, but a false positive pseudo-epidemic. And one on which we are destroying our economies, wrecking people’s livelihoods and causing more deaths than Covid-19 will ever claim."

https://www.rt.com/op-ed/508383-fatal-flaws-covid-test/ The following are four flawed published scientific research papers in The New England Journal of Medicine and the Lancet, that did NOT follow the scientific method for identifying the existence of the coronavirus which organizations and governments relied on for initiating the lockdown and the starting of the Plandemic:

1) The Poutenam Paper

2) The Drosten Paper

3) The Kseazek Paper

4) The Peiris Paper

Is There Current Research Articles on CoVid -19 in 2019 and 2020? What Do These Articles Reveal?

All of the above studies DID NOT meet the first 3 criteria of Rivers Postulates nor addressed the gold standard criteria of steps 4 and 5

What Do These Published Articles Reveal?

The Conclusions from ALL published coronavirus research articles are as follows:

Finally, please read the following short technical paper debunking the RT-PCR tests and its efficacy for determining a test negative or positive for the coronavirus:

"This paper will show numerous serious flaws in the Corman-Drosten paper, the significance of which has led to worldwide misdiagnosis of infections attributed to SARS-CoV-2 and associated with the disease COVID-19. We are confronted with stringent lockdowns which have destroyed many people’s lives and livelihoods, limited access to education and these imposed restrictions by governments around the world are a direct attack on people’s basic rights and their personal freedoms, resulting in collateral damage for entire economies on a global scale. There are ten fatal problems with the Corman-Drosten paper which we will outline and explain in greater detail in the following sections:" Here is the link: https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/


The Corman-Drosten paper contains the following specific FATAL errors:

1. There exists no specified reason to use these extremely high concentrations of primers in this protocol. The described concentrations lead to increased nonspecific bindings and PCR product amplifications, making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

2. Six unspecified wobbly positions will introduce an enormous variability in the real world laboratory implementations of this test; the confusing nonspecific description in the Corman-Drosten paper is not suitable as a Standard Operational Protocol making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

3. The test cannot discriminate between the whole virus and viral fragments. Therefore, the test cannot be used as a diagnostic for intact (infectious) viruses, making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus and make inferences about the presence of an infection.

4. A difference of 10° C with respect to the annealing temperature Tm for primer pair1 (RdRp_SARSr_F and RdRp_SARSr_R) also makes the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

5. A severe error is the omission of a Ct value at which a sample is considered positive and negative. This Ct value is also not found in follow-up submissions making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

6. The PCR products have not been validated at the molecular level. This fact makes the protocol useless as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

7. The PCR test contains neither a unique positive control to evaluate its specificity for SARS-CoV-2 nor a negative control to exclude the presence of other coronaviruses, making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

8. The test design in the Corman-Drosten paper is so vague and flawed that one can go in dozens of different directions; nothing is standardized and there is no SOP. This highly questions the scientific validity of the test and makes it unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

9. Most likely, the Corman-Drosten paper was not peer-reviewed making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

10. There are severe conflicts of interest for at least four authors, in addition to the fact that two of the authors of the Corman-Drosten paper (Christian Drosten and Chantal Reusken) are members of the editorial board of Eurosurveillance. A conflict of interest was added on July 29 2020 (Olfert Landt is CEO of TIB-Molbiol; Marco Kaiser is senior researcher at GenExpress and serves as scientific advisor for TIB-Molbiol), that was not declared in the original version (and still is missing in the PubMed version); TIB-Molbiol is the company which was “the first” to produce PCR kits (Light Mix) based on the protocol published in the Corman-Drosten manuscript, and according to their own words, they distributed these PCR-test kits before the publication was even submitted [20]; further, Victor Corman & Christian Drosten failed to mention their second affiliation: the commercial test laboratory “Labor Berlin”. Both are responsible for the virus diagnostics there [21] and the company operates in the realm of real time PCR-testing.

In light of my re-examination of the test protocol to identify SARS-CoV-2 described in the Corman-Drosten paper I have determined that there are significant errors and inherent fallacies which render the SARS-CoV-2 and 19 PCR testing useless and the coronavirus a phantom virus and NOT the cause of SARS or severe acute respiratory syndrome.

Then What is the Cause of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome if NOT the Coronavirus?

The answer to this question can be found in a research article published in the Integrative Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Journal on June 20th, 2020.[30]

The following is the citation:

Young RO, Migalko G (2020) What Causes Oxygen Deprivation of the Blood(DIC) and Then Lungs(SARS - CoV 2 & 19)?. Integ Mol Bio Biotechnol 1: 001-007

Sending my love, light and hope for your protection, safety and many pH Miracles throughout your life and the lives of those who you love and care about! With the kindest of regards, Robert O. Young CPT, MSc, DSc, PhD, Naturopathic Practitioner, Commission for the International Tribunal for Natural Justice www.drrobertyoung.com/blog


[1] Corman Victor M, Landt Olfert, Kaiser Marco, Molenkamp Richard, Meijer Adam, Chu Daniel KW, Bleicker Tobias, Brünink Sebastian, Schneider Julia, Schmidt Marie Luisa, Mulders Daphne GJC, Haagmans Bart L, van der Veer Bas, van den Brink Sharon, Wijsman Lisa, Goderski Gabriel, Romette Jean-Louis, Ellis Joanna, Zambon Maria, Peiris Malik, Goossens Herman, Reusken Chantal, Koopmans Marion PG, Drosten Christian. Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR. Euro Surveill. 2020;25(3):pii=2000045. https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045

[2] Email communication between Dr. Peter Borger & Dr. Adam Meijer: Supplementary Material

[3] Jafaar et al., Correlation Between 3790 Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction–Positives Samples and Positive Cell Cultures, Including 1941 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Isolates. https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciaa1491/5912603

[4] BBC, January 21st 2020: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-51185836; Archive: https://archive.is/0qRmZ

[5] Google Analytics – COVID19-deaths worldwide: https://bit.ly/3fndemJ Archive: https://archive.is/PpqEE

[6] Laboratory testing for COVID-19 Emergency Response Technical Centre, NIVD under China CDC March 15th, 2020: http://www.chinacdc.cn/en/COVID19/202003/P020200323390321297894.pdf

[7] Real-Time PCR Handbook Life Technologies: https://www.thermofisher.com/content/dam/LifeTech/global/Forms/PDF/real-time-pcr- handbook.pdf

Nolan T, Huggett J, Sanchez E.Good practice guide for the application of quantitative PCR (qPCR) First Edition 2013

[8] Trestan Pillonel et al, Letter to the editor: SARS-CoV-2 detection by real-time RT-PCR: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7268274/

[9] Kurkela, Satu, and David WG Brown. “Molecular-diagnostic techniques.” Medicine 38.10 (2009): 535-540.

[10] Wolfel et al., Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2196-x

[11] Thermofischer Primer Dimer Web Tool: https://www.thermofisher.com/us/en/home/brands/thermo-scientific/molecular-biology/molecular-biology-learning-center/molecular-biology-resource-library/thermo-scientific-web-tools/multiple-primer-analyzer.html Supplementary Material

[12] Primer-BLAST, NCBI – National Center for Biotechnology Information: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/

[13] Marra MA, Steven JMJ, Caroline RA, Robert AH, Angela BW et al. (2003) Science. The Genome sequence of the SARS-associated coronavirus. Science 300(5624): 1399-1404.

[14] Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 isolate Wuhan-Hu-1, complete genome: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MN908947

[15] Borger P. A SARS-like Coronavirus was expected but nothing was done to be prepared. Am J Biomed Sci Res 2020. https://biomedgrid.com/pdf/AJBSR.MS.ID.001312.pdf https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341120750_A_SARS- like_Coronavirus_was_Expected_but_nothing_was_done_to_be_Prepared; Archive: https://archive.is/i76Hu

[16] Eurosurveillance paper evaluation / review process: https://www.eurosurveillance.org/evaluation

[17] Official recommendation of the Corman-Drosten protocol & manuscript by the WHO,published on January 13th 2020 as version 1.0 of the document: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/wuhan-virus-assay- v1991527e5122341d99287a1b17c111902.pdf; archive: https://bit.ly/3m3jXVH

[18] Official WHO-recommendation for the Corman / Drosten RT-qPCR-protocol, which directly derives from the Eurosurveillance-publication, document-version 2-1, published on 17th January 2020: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/protocol-v2- 1.pdf?sfvrsn=a9ef618c_2

[19] Eurosurveillance Editorial Board, 2020: https://www.eurosurveillance.org/upload/site- assets/imgs/2020-09-Editorial%20Board%20PDF.pdf; Archive: https://bit.ly/2TqXBjX

[20] Instructions For Use LightMix SarbecoV E-gene plus EAV Control, TIB-Molbiol & Roche Molecular Solutions, January 11th 2020: https://www.roche-as.es/lm_pdf/MDx_40-0776_96_Sarbeco-E- gene_V200204_09164154001 (1).pdf Archive, timestamp – January 11th 2020: https://archive.is/Vulo5; Archive: https://bit.ly/3fm9bXH

[21] Christian Drosten & Victor Corman, responsible for viral diagnostics at Labor Berlin: https://www.laborberlin.com/fachbereiche/virologie/ Archive: https://archive.is/CDEUG

[22] Tom Jefferson, Elizabeth Spencer, Jon Brassey, Carl Heneghan Viral cultures for COVID- 19 infectivity assessment. Systematic review. Systematic review doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.04.20167932 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.08.04.20167932v4

[23] Kim et al.,The Architecture of SARS-CoV-2 Transcriptome: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867420304062

[24] ECDC reply to Dr. Peter Borger, 18th November 2020: Supplementary Material

[25] Prof. Dr. Ulrike Kämmerer & team, survey & Primer-BLAST table: Supplementary Material

[26] Young RO (2016) Second Thoughts about Viruses, Vaccines, and the HIV/AIDS Hypothesis - Part 1. Int J Vaccines Vaccin 2(3): 00032. DOI: 10.15406/ijvv.2016.02.00032

[27] Young RO (2016) Second Thoughts Concerning Viruses, Vaccines and the HIV/AIDS Hypothesis - Part 2. Int J Vaccines Vaccin 2(3): 00034. DOI: 10.15406/ijvv.2016.02.00034

[28] Young RO (2016) Second Thoughts Concerning Viruses, Vaccines and the HIV/AIDS Hypothesis - Part 3 HIV/AIDS and the Monomorphic Disease Model. Int J Vaccines Vaccin 2(3): 00035. DOI: 10.15406/ijvv.2016.02.00035

[29] The Genesis of Severe Acute Respiratory (Syndrome) Disease or SARS (Coronavirus - COVID - 2 and COVID - 19) is Found in the Interstitial Fluids of Intestitium. https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/the-genesis-of-severe-acute-respiratory-syndrome-or-sars-corona-virus-or-covid-19

[30] Young RO, Migalko G (2020) What Causes Oxygen Deprivation of the Blood(DIC) and Then Lungs(SARS - CoV 2 & 12)?. Integ Mol Bio Biotechnol 1: 001-007

Additional literature: Description RT-PCR RKI Germany, on page 10 of this link: https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/Gesundheitsmonitoring/Gesundheitsberichterstattung/GBE DownloadsJ/JoHM_S5_2020_Studienprotokoll_CORONA_MONITORING_lokal.pdf?__blob=p ublicationFile

Interviews with Dr. Robert O Young can be found at: https://www.youtube.com/c/RobertYoung555/playlists

5,088 views0 comments
  • Black Facebook Icon
  • Black LinkedIn Icon
  • Black Twitter Icon
  • Black Pinterest Icon